Progress in Nutrition SCIE

中文简介

《营养进展》杂志成立于1999年，是一份独立的多学科杂志，致力于研究营养和代谢问题。意大利营养科学学会(SISA)的官方期刊，由营养和食品研究协会(ARNA)赞助。2001年起由摘录协会Medica/Scopus编制索引，2008年起由汤姆森- isi编制索引：科学引文索引扩展(SciSearch?)；具有影响因子的期刊引用报告/科学版。营养方面的进展采用双盲审查。评审员不知道作者的身份，而作者也不知道评审员的身份。每期文章的总数量至少有三名或更多的审稿人。每一份手稿至少要提交给一位科学评审。这些评审人员各自向编辑提交一份对作品的评价，指出不足之处或问题，并提出改进建议。通常，大多数裁判的评论最终都会被作者看到。评论者对作者保持匿名。编辑在将一项决定提交给作者(通常是连同审稿人的意见一起)之前，要评估审稿人的评论、审稿人对稿件的看法，以及期刊的范围、图书的级别和读者的背景。评审人员的评估通常包括对如何处理手稿或提案的明确建议。审稿人的角色是咨询性的，编辑通常没有接受审稿人意见的正式义务。

投稿网址：http://www.mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/progressinnutrition/about/submissions

英文简介

Progress in Nutrition was founded in 1999 as an independent magazine, a multidisciplinary approach, dedicated to issues of nutrition and metabolism. Official journal of the Italian Society of Nutritional Science (SISA) and sponsored by Nutrition and Food Researchers Association (ARNA). From 2001 is indexed by Excerpta Medica/Scopus, and from 2008 is indexed by Thomson-ISI: Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch?); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition with Impact Factor.Progress in Nutrition employs double-blind review. Reviewers are unaware of the identity of the authors, and authors are also unaware of the identity of reviewers. There are at least three or more reviewers for the total number of articles in each issue.Every manuscript is submitted at least to one Scientific Referees.These referees each return an evaluation of the work to the editor, noting weaknesses or problems along with suggestions for improvement. Typically, most of the referees' comments are eventually seen by the author. Reviewers remain anonymous to the authors. The Editor evaluates the referees' comments, her or his own opinion of the manuscript,and the context of the scope of the journal or level of the book and readership,before passing a decision back to the author(s),usually with the referees' comments.Referees' evaluations usually include an explicit recommendation of what to do with the manuscript or proposal. The role of the referees is advisory,and the editor is typically under no formal obligation to accept the opinions of the referees.