EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE SCIE

中文简介

《欧亚土壤科学》是一份国际同行评议期刊，发表关于全球和区域土壤成因、地理、物理、化学、生物学、肥力、管理、保护和修复的理论和实验研究的原创文章。该杂志欢迎所有国家的英文或俄文手稿。同行评审《欧亚土壤科学》是一份同行评议期刊。我们使用双盲同行评审格式。我们的评审团队包括来自8个国家(美国、奥地利、德国、匈牙利、格鲁吉亚等)的190多名国内外评审人员(65%)。2017年从提交到首次评审的平均周期为25天，从首次评审到验收的平均周期为60天。2017年投稿退稿率为15%。接受发表文章的最终决定由编辑委员会作出。被邀请的审稿人因利益冲突，认为不符合审稿条件或者不能审稿的，应当及时通知审稿人，并予以拒绝。审稿人应以一种合理合理的方式清晰地阐述自己的观点，这样作者才能利用审稿人的观点来完善稿件。必须避免对作者的个人批评。评论者应该显示发表的一篇评论(我)任何相关的工作没有被引用的作者,(2)任何已报道在以前的出版物和没有适当的参考或引用,(2)任何实质性相似或重叠与其他手稿(发表或未发表)的个人知识。

投稿网址：https://www.springer.com/earth+sciences+and+geography/engineering+geology/journal/11475

英文简介

Eurasian Soil Science is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes original articles on global and regional theoretical and experimental studies of the genesis, geography, physics, chemistry, biology, fertility, management, conservation, and remediation of soils. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.PEER REVIEWEurasian Soil Science is a peer reviewed journal. We use a double blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes over 190 reviewers, both internal and external (65%), from 8 coutntries (USA, Austria, Germany, Hungary, Georgia, etc.). The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 25 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 60 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2017 was 15%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editorial Board.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.