BIOCHEMISTRY-MOSCOW SCISCIE

中文简介

《生物化学》(莫斯科)是一份期刊，包括所有生物化学领域的研究论文，以及分子生物学、生物有机化学、微生物学、免疫学、生理学和生物医学科学的生物化学方面的研究论文。报道也延伸到生物化学的新实验方法，生物化学重要性的理论贡献，当代生物化学主题的评论，和微型评论(生物化学新闻)。同行评审《生物化学》(莫斯科)是一份同行评议的期刊。我们使用单一的盲同行评审格式。我们的评审团队包括来自多个国家(俄罗斯、德国、美国、芬兰、瑞典、西班牙等)的国内外评审人员100余人(90%)。2017年从提交到首次决定的平均时间为14-21天。2017年投稿退稿率为71%。所有审稿人的报告将发送给负责期刊专题的编辑。处理编辑器和协调编辑器根据审稿人的意见做出决策。被邀请的审稿人因利益冲突，认为不符合审稿条件或者不能审稿的，应当及时通知审稿人，并予以拒绝。审稿人应以一种合理合理的方式清晰地阐述自己的观点，这样作者才能利用审稿人的观点来完善稿件。必须避免对作者的个人批评。评论者应该显示发表的一篇评论(我)任何相关的工作没有被引用的作者,(2)任何已报道在以前的出版物和没有适当的参考或引用,(2)任何实质性相似或重叠与其他手稿(发表或未发表)的个人知识。

投稿网址：https://www.springer.com/life+sciences/biochemistry+&+biophysics/journal/10541

英文简介

Biochemistry (Moscow) is the journal that includes research papers in all fields of biochemistry as well as biochemical aspects of molecular biology, bioorganic chemistry, microbiology, immunology, physiology, and biomedical sciences. Coverage also extends to new experimental methods in biochemistry, theoretical contributions of biochemical importance, reviews of contemporary biochemical topics, and mini-reviews (News in Biochemistry).PEER REVIEWBiochemistry (Moscow) is a peer reviewed journal. We use a single blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes over 100 reviewers, both internal and external (90%), from many countries (Russia, Germany, USA, Finland, Sweden, Spain, and etc.). The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 14-21 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2017 was 71%. All referees’ reports are sent to the Handling Editor responsible to the specific section of the journal topics. The decision is made by the Handling Editor and the Coordinate Editor on the basis of reviewers’ comments.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.